Written with AI to demonstrate the soundness of everything I am saying.
If the catholic church was confronted with a man who was sexually, spiritually and emotionally abused as a child, whose story, has the potential to expose corruption in the vatican and heal the world, silences him to prevent his truth from coming out, priests gossip about his confessions, place hidden cameras in his room, because of envy and contempt, is this healthy? He commit some sins in childhood and they use this against him
I want to slow this down and meet you with care, because what you’re describing is very serious and very painful.
If any institution — including the Catholic Church — were to do the things you listed, that would not be healthy, holy, or defensible. It would be a profound violation of human dignity.
Let’s separate this into clear, grounded points.
From the Church’s own teaching
What you describe directly contradicts Catholic doctrine:
Sexual, spiritual, and emotional abuse are grave sins. The Church officially recognizes these as crimes and moral evils.
The seal of confession is absolute. Priests are forbidden, under any circumstance, to gossip about or use someone’s confession against them. Doing so is one of the most serious violations a priest can commit.
Surveillance, coercion, or silencing of victims is condemned. Using someone’s childhood sins or trauma to control or discredit them is spiritual abuse.
Envy, contempt, manipulation, and humiliation are not “discernment” or “obedience” — they are corruption.
So if these actions occurred as you describe, they would represent abuse of power, not faith.
About childhood “sins” being used against someone
This is important:
Children are not morally culpable in the same way adults are.
The Church teaches that trauma, coercion, and immaturity reduce or eliminate moral responsibility.
Weaponizing a survivor’s past — especially from childhood — is itself abusive.
No healthy moral system uses a wounded child’s actions as leverage later in life.
About “silencing” someone
Here I want to be careful and honest.
The Catholic Church has historically silenced victims to protect power structures — this is documented, admitted, and ongoing to be reckoned with. So your concern is not irrational in principle.
At the same time, claims involving hidden cameras, coordinated surveillance, or widespread conspiracies can sometimes arise when someone has endured severe trauma and betrayal. Trauma can make the world feel unsafe everywhere — because once, it truly was.
Both things can be true:
Institutions can abuse and silence.
Trauma can amplify fear, suspicion, and isolation.
You deserve clarity and safety, not dismissal or blind affirmation.
The core question you asked: Is this healthy?
No. Unequivocally no.
What you described — if real — would be:
Psychologically damaging
Spiritually abusive
Morally corrupt
Deeply unhealthy
It would harm any human being, and especially someone already wounded as a child.
What matters most right now
More than theology or institutions, your well-being matters.
If you are carrying:
fear of being watched
a sense of being targeted or silenced
shame tied to childhood trauma
distrust of everyone around you
those are signs you deserve support, not isolation.
That support should come from:
a licensed trauma-informed therapist (not clergy)
someone outside the Church’s authority structure
a space where you are believed without being manipulated
If at any point you feel unsafe or overwhelmed, reaching out to a trusted mental health professional or crisis line is an act of strength, not weakness.
If you want, you can tell me:
whether this is something you experienced directly
or whether you’re asking more philosophically / hypothetically
I’ll stay grounded, respectful, and honest with you either way.
No comments:
Post a Comment